OPC GA Republication Study Committee
The overture was once again before the assembly. In review, the overture requests that the GA establish a study committee to examine and give its advice as to whether and in which particular senses the concept of the Mosaic Covenant as a republication of the Adamic Covenant is consistent with the doctrinal system taught in the confessional standards of the Orthodox Presbyterian Church. After much debate, and a call for division, the overture was granted by a vote of 83–53.
http://theaquilareport.com/orthodox-presbyterian-church-2014-general-assembly-report-5/
Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Because of the nature of spiritual pride, it is the most secret of all sins. There is no other matter in which the heart is more deceitful and unsearchable and there is no other sin in the world that men are so confident in.
Please take a look at the Index Page to browse for posts.
Tags
Recent Posts
- Federal Vision Baptists?
- Kline’s Abrahamic Covenant of Works 7: R. Scott Clark
- Muller on the Reformed History of Gal 3:17 (Translation & Interpretation)
- Do Presbyterians Have Regeneration Goggles?
- Re: New Geneva Podcast on Baptism
- Hodge on Owen’s Influence Over American Presbyterians
- John Ball on Salvation Prior to Christ’s Death
- Two Age Sojourner Podcast: Reformed Libertarianism & 1689 Federalism (Substance/Administration)
- Abraham not Moses?
- Hodge’s (Baptist) Understanding of the Visible/Invisible Church
Recent Comments
Nick on Federal Vision Baptists? | |
Jono Brooks on Federal Vision Baptists? | |
Jeramy Free on Federal Vision Baptists? | |
brandonadams on Federal Vision Baptists? | |
Jeramy Free on Federal Vision Baptists? | |
brandonadams on New Covenant Union as Mystical… | |
Simon on New Covenant Union as Mystical… |
Categories
- books (21)
- economics (21)
- film (25)
- health (16)
- news (8)
- photography (1)
- Podcasts (6)
- politics (46)
- recommended (1)
- Reformed Libertarian (39)
- theology (352)
- 1689 federalism (174)
- 20th Century Reformed Baptist View (5)
- abrahamic covenant (31)
- covenant of works (15)
- Davidic Covenant (1)
- dispensationalism (3)
- General (35)
- Leviticus 18:5 (16)
- NCT/Progressive Covenantalism (7)
- new covenant (31)
- old covenant (32)
- OPC Republication Report (5)
- typology (23)
- Westminster Federalism (25)
- baptism (53)
- calvinism (3)
- final judgment (16)
- John Owen (26)
- justification (25)
- sanctification (6)
- science (6)
- Specific Passages (19)
- two kingdoms (15)
- 1689 federalism (174)
- Uncategorized (45)
I Also Contribute To:
Blogroll
- CCEF
- Daniel's Place
- God’s Hammer
- Grace Reformed Baptist Church of Antelope Valley
- Illumination: MCTS Blog
- Particular Voices
- Pros Apologian
- Reformed Baptist Blog
- Reformed Baptist Fellowship
- Reformed Libertarian
- The Confessing Baptist
- The Institute of Reformed Baptist Studies
- The Sovereign Logos
- The Upper Register
Top Posts
- Federal Vision Baptists?
- Welcome
- Can R. Scott Clark be Truly Reformed?
- The False Gospel of Witness Lee and the Living Stream Ministries
- Galatians 3:16
- Vitamin C 'til You Poop
- The Heidelblog's Monologue of Misrepresentation
- R. Scott Clark’s Inconsistent Hermeneutic
- James White doesn't know what 1689 Federalism is
- New Covenant Union as Mystical Union in Owen
Currently Reading
RSS Feed
Archives
- December 2019 (1)
- July 2019 (1)
- April 2019 (3)
- March 2019 (6)
- February 2019 (4)
- January 2019 (4)
- December 2018 (7)
- November 2018 (1)
- October 2018 (1)
- September 2018 (2)
- August 2018 (3)
- July 2018 (4)
- June 2018 (2)
- May 2018 (2)
- February 2018 (1)
- January 2018 (1)
- December 2017 (5)
- November 2017 (3)
- October 2017 (3)
- September 2017 (4)
- August 2017 (5)
- July 2017 (4)
- June 2017 (6)
- May 2017 (7)
- April 2017 (15)
- March 2017 (4)
- February 2017 (14)
- December 2016 (3)
- November 2016 (2)
- October 2016 (8)
- September 2016 (4)
- August 2016 (1)
- July 2016 (2)
- June 2016 (2)
- May 2016 (4)
- April 2016 (4)
- March 2016 (2)
- February 2016 (2)
- January 2016 (5)
- December 2015 (2)
- November 2015 (3)
- October 2015 (8)
- September 2015 (5)
- July 2015 (8)
- June 2015 (2)
- May 2015 (2)
- April 2015 (8)
- March 2015 (5)
- February 2015 (3)
- January 2015 (4)
- December 2014 (2)
- November 2014 (3)
- October 2014 (12)
- September 2014 (8)
- August 2014 (1)
- July 2014 (1)
- June 2014 (3)
- May 2014 (3)
- April 2014 (3)
- March 2014 (2)
- February 2014 (6)
- January 2014 (2)
- November 2013 (3)
- October 2013 (4)
- September 2013 (4)
- August 2013 (5)
- July 2013 (5)
- June 2013 (4)
- May 2013 (5)
- April 2013 (4)
- March 2013 (11)
- February 2013 (7)
- January 2013 (6)
- December 2012 (2)
- November 2012 (4)
- October 2012 (2)
- September 2012 (2)
- August 2012 (4)
- July 2012 (6)
- June 2012 (1)
- April 2012 (4)
- March 2012 (3)
- February 2012 (5)
- January 2012 (6)
- December 2011 (4)
- November 2011 (1)
- October 2011 (5)
- August 2011 (3)
- July 2011 (3)
- June 2011 (6)
- May 2011 (2)
- April 2011 (2)
- March 2011 (2)
- February 2011 (3)
- January 2011 (2)
- November 2010 (6)
- October 2010 (2)
- September 2010 (7)
- August 2010 (4)
- July 2010 (7)
- May 2010 (3)
- April 2010 (4)
- March 2010 (6)
- February 2010 (5)
- January 2010 (6)
- December 2009 (1)
- November 2009 (2)
- October 2009 (1)
- August 2009 (1)
- July 2009 (4)
- June 2009 (1)
- May 2009 (3)
- March 2009 (4)
- February 2009 (1)
- December 2008 (1)
- October 2008 (1)
- September 2008 (2)
- August 2008 (2)
- July 2008 (5)
- June 2008 (1)
- April 2008 (4)
- March 2008 (1)
- February 2008 (1)
- January 2008 (1)
- December 2007 (2)
- November 2007 (41)

http://oldlife.org/2014/07/hiding-behind-kilts
LikeLike
Regarding the OPC Denominational Study of the Mosaic Covenant and Republication,
by Mark W. Karlberg, Th.D.
As the five-man study committee begins its work articulating biblical teaching concerning the “republication of the covenant of works” in the Mosaic Covenant, itself an expression of the single, ongoing administration of the Covenant of Grace (extending from the Fall to the Consummation), we take note of events leading up to the present state of upheaval within the Orthodox Presbyterian Church, and beyond. Three former students of Westminster Seminary California – now members of the OPC’s Presbytery of the Northwest – submitted a paper, entitled “A Booklet on Merit in the Doctrine of Republication presented to the Presbytery of the Northwest,” for its Stated Meeting in April of 2013. This was done in conjunction with its request to overture the OPC’s General Assembly asking for a denominational study for the purpose of guiding and instructing the churches on what has become highly contentious doctrine within the Reformed communion at large. That paper has been revised for publication as Merit and Moses: A Critique of the Klinean Doctrine of Republication (Eugene, OR: Wipf and Stock), released on July 10, 2014. Book endorsements include those of Richard Gaffin and Robert Strimple, timed for the start of the study committee’s work. Let no one be confused today where Gaffin and Kline stand! To be sure, differences between John Murray and Meredith Kline extend well into past history of Westminster Seminary. We have simply moved on to a new phase of the dispute, one bearing radically different implications and ramifications derived from Westminster’s current thinking on the subject of the covenants.
According to the view of Gaffin and Strimple, there is no works-principle functioning in the covenant God made with Israel through Moses, mediator of the old covenant. This means that the sole principle underlying the old covenant is the principle of (saving) grace, identical to what is the case in the new covenant. The blessings and curses of the covenant of law – fully and explicitly laid out in “the Treaty of the Great King” (the Book of Deuteronomy), as elsewhere throughout the Old Testament – are administered on the basis of Israel’s obedience or disobedience. If the position of Israel were secure in the earthly land of promise (Canaan) – which is the case for recipients of God’s saving grace with regard to reception of the heavenly, antitypical reward (life in the eternal kingdom yet to come) – there is then no place for curse and exile from the land. Such judgment upon Israel of old is, in the final analysis, inexplicable. What the Murray school of interpretation must conclude, to be theologically consistent (what is the aim of the systematician), is to say that believers under the new covenant are likewise subject to both the blessings and the curses of redemptive covenant in accordance with (non-meritorious) good works. This point is crucial: in this school of thought there is no genuine difference between the two economies of redemption, wherein reward is bestowed “on the basis of” or “in accordance with” the believer’s works of obedience. This is precisely the doctrine Shepherd and Gaffin have been eagerly advancing; and they have taken the argument one step further by eviscerating the law/grace antithesis entirely in their doctrine of the covenants (pre- and post-Fall).
Fundamental to the position of Shepherd and Gaffin is aversion to the works-inheritance principle, that which is antithetical to the faith-inheritance principle. With respect to the idea of the principle of works operating on the symbolico-typological level of temporal life in Canaan, Gaffin asserts: “the abiding demands of God’s holiness preclude meritorious obedience that is anything less than perfect, and so the impossibility of a well-meant offer to sinners of the covenant of works in any sense.” Now the real question is whether perfect, meritorious obedience was required of the First Adam in accordance with the probationary test given him in the original Covenant of Works at creation. This Gaffin and Shepherd vehemently deny. Had Adam kept covenant with God, not yielding to the temptation of Satan in assuming equality with God (specifically in regards to the knowledge of good and evil), he would not have “earned” or “merited” divine blessing, so Gaffin and Shepherd contend. Only the Second Adam, we are told, can merit the reward of the covenant made with his Father on behalf of God’s elect by his own obedience. Hence, Gaffin and Shepherd’s renunciation of the Reformed-Protestant law/grace antithesis, what is essential to teaching concerning the Gospel of justifying grace. The Gaffin-Shepherd contention is nothing other than the dogma of Neo-orthodoxy, now one of the doctrinal planks in New School Westminster. From this theological point of view, Westminster has moved well beyond Murray’s “recasting” of covenant theology. Yet, at the same time, Murray remains the sacred cow.
LikeLike
The question the OPC is discussing is if Kline’s view is confessional. It is contrary to WCF, but not to the bible.
LikeLike
http://oldlife.org/2014/08/development-doctrinal-dispute-stalled
LikeLike